![]() The IDE-Haskell REPL package is in beta and currently offers a rather minimal interface into ghci.Ī hassle-free, complete, one-stop solution is Intero for Emacs, and this is what is described here. What I don't like about Atom for Haskell is that the REPL isn't that well integrated, yet. In general I really like Atom, and after some fiddling with path settings, it worked very well. My remaining grief with Vim is the speed of type lookups and linter runs ( Issue #201). (See Issue #199 of Haskell-Vim-Now and Issue #63 of the Haskell codex package) ![]() I had some problems with the installation but these were resolved quickly thanks to very dedicated maintainers. I struggled to configure Vim until I discovered Haskell-Vim-Now, which promises that " in less than ten minutes your Vim will transform into a beautiful Haskell paradise". For beginners, this is a very good choice. On the upside, no other tool I've seen integrates the REPL as nicely as Haskell for Mac does. cabal file inside the project folder can't be edited and it doesn't allow for multiple executables, or any custom project structure. Haskell for Mac was nice while I was learning Haskell basics, but it's not adequate for larger projects because the. First let's run through a selection of alternatives that all have great features but are each lacking in some particular way. After trying Vim, Atom and Haskell for Mac I converged on Emacs with the Intero package. Haskellers are not exactly blessed with an abundance of IDEs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |